Give parliament a clean start

Just 265 MPs have stated definitely that they will stand again, and parliamentary officials are predicting a quarter of MPs will eventually stand down before the General Election, according to the Daily Telegraph. Although this is set to be the biggest exodus in living memory, voters may legitimately be asking the question: “why aren’t more going?” We know that politics in Britain is broken. A large number of MPs who assisted in breaking it, by first voting against the disclosure of their expenses, and then through their unrepentant response when found out, are still staying. Should we really rehire the people who broke it to fix it?

Staying on too long in parliament is like staying too long as the captain of a sports team, when you no longer have the fitness and reactions to be there. I feel this somewhat keenly at the moment, since, as of 1 January, I have stepped down from captaining the West Midlands fencing team. At the age of 43, I am more than twice as old as half of the team, and it was time to move on. The upper age for politics is rather older, but even MPs need to recognise when it’s time to go. This time, though, it’s not retirement and pension which is the issue — it’s the simple fact that MPs have lost our confidence. For some this is an unfair ‘guilty by association’, but others lost our trust because they abused it. For the good of the team, they need to be off.

It appears, though, that not everyone has got the message. In fact, we have politicians who fought tooth and nail against Heather Brooke’s campaign for full disclosure of expenses, voted against it in parliament, and then tried to resurrect their careers and put one over on their opponents by representing themselves as the peoples’ champions when the Telegraph got hold of the story.

We are expecting a number of announcements over the next weeks. Some MPs can honourably step down, having worked hard for many years for the good of their constituents. They deserve our respect. Some MPs who are expenses-damaged but still holding on should go. That way, they can win back some of our respect, and ensure that the next parliament is given the best possible start with a clean slate.

It will be a long, hard job to win back the confidence of the public. But it is a job which must be done, no matter how hard, nor how long.

One Comment

  1. Gordon Brace
    Jan 04, 2010 @ 21:53:12

    Martin, As an oldie, I am mightily glad that William Gladstone and Winston Churchill “Stayed too long in Parliament” which is not a fencing match although present incumbents are doing their best to reduce it to one. The “Democratic deficit” and the centralisation of power in government, industry and finance is the root of our ills and that is what Libdems should be fighting about, not expenses fiddled (at about 0.00001%) the significance of banking fiddles and out of sight compared with taking this nation to war, based on truth fiddling, with its consequent excacerbation of world instability and terrorism. For heavens sake fight on issues that really matter, like giving MP’s and Councillors some real power to represent the needs and views of their constituents – without this it’s all hot air. Best of luck in thr campaign. Gordon

Back to Top