An unseemly row that shows no-one in a good light
BBC NEWS | Politics | Tories will not name key backers
Confused by the latest spat over cash for peerages? Amazed by the duplicity of our leading politicians? Or just bored by another dreary day in our increasingly dreary national life?
The current spat over cash for peerages sadly confirms everyone’s most cynical feelings about politics and politicians.
If you believe the story, as told, that New Labour have been playing the old game of political favours for money, then you are probably also thinking back to the cash in brown envelopes that helped to bring abou the fall of John Major’s government.
On the other hand, if you only half believe the allegation — which is unproven, and for which there is no actual evidence — that Labour loners (sorry, that’s ‘loaners’) were promised peerages for cash, and you are troubled by the fact that 2/3 of the lenders (is that a better word?) have not been offered a peerage, then you are probably wondering if it is ever possible to discover anything which is both true and relevant about the way this country is run.
On the other, other hand (Zaphod) if you have not been taken in by any of this, you are probably groaning at the spin and counter spin of the Tories accusing Labour, and then Labour publishing its backers to put the Tories on the back foot, and then the Tories refusing to name their backers but at the same time saying there should not ever be any more political loans… well, if you weren’t taken in by the whole thing you already know what you think.
What is troubling for the ordinary voter (or, indeed, the ordinary parliamentary candidate, young and idealistic, longing to make his or her way into the House, desperately trying to believe that it isn’t as murky as it’s made out to be) is the dreariness of the whole thing. We want to know about global warming, about the future of the NHS, about the pensions crisis, about avian flu (or pandemic flu, for the better informed). We want answers to terrorism, and something done for Africa, and solutions for drugs, obesity, too much drinking and unplanned teenage pregnancies. We want less crime committed, and to be sure that we’re safe on the internet, and for the next generation to get jobs and be able to afford houses.
The bizarre goings-on of the honours system and huge loans to political parties is just more information than we want right now.
At the end of the day, we want to elect (or, for candidates, we want to be) people who are both trustworthy and competent, and who have a vision for a better Britain and a better world which chimes with our own hopes. We don’t want to elect a load of Peter-Pan politicians who never grow up and spend their lives scoring points of each other (and no doubt calling each other ‘oiks’ when the microphones are switched off) and experimenting with the school rules to see how they can give out more detentions and do less homework. But every scandal of this nature, pumped up by both sides, merely confirms the notion that Westminster is an overgrown boys prep-school with unfathomable traditions and a strict code of ethics that has no connection with anybody else’s ideas of right and wrong.
O, Britain, Britain (to paraphrase Macduff). What will become of you?